Thursday, September 10, 2026
Source trace. Via News points to the documents behind its reporting and shows what we drew from each — so you can check any claim. How we source
Source document· November 13, 2025

Why Is Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) Up 1.7% Since Last Earnings Report?

View original at finance.yahoo.com
Why Is Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) Up 1.7% Since Last Earnings Report? A month has gone by since the last earnings report for Johnson & Johnson (JNJ)…
Opening lines of the source · short snapshot — read the full document at the original

What we drew from this source

The claims Via News extracted from this document. We point to the source; we don't replace it.

  • 2026 consensus estimates for both top- and bottom-line are too low; J&J expects top-line growth of more than 5% vs consensus of ~4.6%

    80% confidence
  • Adjusted pretax operating margin expected to improve by approximately 300 basis points in 2025

    80% confidence
  • JNJ has a VGM Score of C overall, Growth Score C, Momentum Score D, Value Score B

    80% confidence
  • Stelara loss of exclusivity hurt revenue growth by 640 basis points in Q3 2025

    80% confidence
  • Q3 2025 sales were $24.0 billion, beating consensus estimate of $23.74 billion, up 6.8% YoY

    80% confidence
  • J&J expects to launch Shockwave C2 Aero catheter and Tecnis intraocular lens in the US, and submit OTTAVA robotic surgical system for regulatory approval in 2026

    80% confidence
  • Adjusted tax rate for 2025 expected to be approximately 17.5% to 18%, up from prior guidance of 17% to 17.5%

    80% confidence
  • Adjusted EPS guidance maintained at $10.80-$10.90; higher tax rate and Q4 manufacturing investments offset better operational outlook

    80% confidence
  • Net interest expense now projected between $0 million and $50 million vs prior expectation of $0 million to $100 million

    80% confidence
  • Stelara LOE negatively impacted Innovative Medicines segment growth by 1070 basis points; excluding Stelara, Innovative Medicines rose around 16%

    80% confidence
  • 2026 adjusted EPS expected to be approximately $0.05 above consensus of $11.39 per share

    80% confidence
  • Both Innovative Medicines and MedTech segment growth expected to accelerate in 2026

    80% confidence
  • Q3 2025 adjusted earnings per share were $2.80, beating consensus estimate of $2.77, up 15.7% YoY

    80% confidence
  • Johnson & Johnson has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold); in-line return expected in the next few months

    80% confidence
  • 2025 full-year sales guidance raised to $93.5B-$93.9B, implying growth of 5.4%-5.9%

    80% confidence
What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
AI Capital Boom Meets Valuation Jitters: Funding Surges While Bellwether Stocks Wobble
A dense wave of AI-sector funding (Socure, Stability AI, Emerald AI, Generalist AI, Gatik, Regent Craft and others closing rounds on the same day) and strong enterprise-automation earnings (UiPath raising full-year guidance) point to continued heavy capital deployment into AI infrastructure, fintech-adjacent AI, and agentic automation. Yet Palantir's stock fell even after winning the Army's high-profile TITAN contract, and commentary (e.g., the Alphabet bull case citing AI capex and regulatory risk) signals growing investor unease about whether current AI valuations and spending levels are sustainable.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
Satellite-Terrestrial Network Integration Acceleration
Increased investment and launches in hybrid satellite-cellular networks across telecom industry; competitive responses from other carriers; regulatory activity around satellite spectrum; expansion of emergency/rural connectivity use cases
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Both facts represent the same entity (JPMorgan Chase & Co.), same attribute (EPS), and same observation date (2025-12-31), which aligns with FY 2025 year-end reporting. Fact A explicitly states FY 2025 with EPS of 20.02 USD/share. Fact B has an unspecified fiscal period (N/A) but reports 4.63 USD, a significantly different value (4.3x lower). Given identical observation dates and the same metric, both facts appear intended to represent FY 2025 annual EPS. The conflicting values (20.02 vs 4.63) constitute a direct contradiction. The N/A period in Fact B suggests incomplete or corrupted metadata rather than legitimate time-period variation.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
Checked against the original source
4,981
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,981 facts checked against source5,278 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com